PSC logo
Professional Staff Congress

HOME | PSC-NEWS | SITE MAP

 

 

JVOICES AGAINST
TUITION HIKES

JUNE 2003

 

*Very loud and very clear  

 

back to main page of

Testimony to the
Board of Trustees of the City University of New York
June 16, 2003

Agenda Item 4A, Proposed Tuition Increases,
Potential for Adverse Impact on Ethnolinguistic Minorities

 

Mary O’Riordan, Ed.D., Assistant Professor
College English as a Second Language Program,
English Department
New York City College of Technology/CUNY
 

I’m Mary O’Riordan and I’m an Assistant Professor of ESL at City Tech.  I address you today because I think it important that you understand the degree to which the tuition increases proposed for community colleges may disproportionately affect ethnolinguistic minorities.  Please allow me a few minutes to go through some data (also attached to my written testimony) which will substantiate this concern. 

The US Census estimated number of New Yorkers who indicated that they did not speak English “very well” grew from 1,361,746 in 1990 to 1,768,977 in 2000 and the estimated number of foreign-born increased from 2,082,931 in 1990 to 2,871,032 in 2000.  This reflects for our City a 38% increase in foreign-born and a 30% increase in language-minorities or, in other words, an increase in the percentage of language-minorities from 20% in 1990 to 24% of the population in 2000 and an increase in the percentage of foreign-born from 28% in 1990 to 40% of the population in 2000 (see Table A). 

As the University’s Office of Institutional Research and Assessment acknowledged in an attachment to the SED Spring 2002 Monitoring Report, however, “the number of students enrolled in ESL courses at CUNY has dropped substantially” (p. 68), from 3,437 in Fall 1999 to 2,235 in Fall 2001 (-20 %) (see Table B).  OIRA has attributed the decline primarily to improving preparation in English language skills.  However, this is unlikely given radical changes in enrollment at certain colleges from one year to the next such as the decline at Lehman College from 124 in Fall 1999 to 46 in Fall 2000 and to 24 in Fall 2001.  In addition, it is not true, as OIRA has asserted, that enrollment during this period of time in the alternative CUNY Language Immersion Program has increased (see Table C).  The numbers of students who are foreign-born and the numbers of those who report that they are more comfortable in a language other than English has also declined from 48% of foreign-born in Fall 1998 to 45% in Fall 2001 and from 16% LOTE in Fall 1998 to 13% in Fall 2001 (see Table D).   

The majority of those students left in the University attend community colleges (68%).  And according to an OIRA overview of “Basic Skills and ESL at CUNY”, at least in 1995 (the last time these data were collected for ESL students) they were considerably poorer and more likely to have children than other students enrolled in Associate Degree Programs (see Table E).  For example, while only 36% of non-ESL students were financially independent, most ESL students reported that they were supporting themselves.  ESL students also reported income that was on the average 40% lower than that for non-ESL students. 

In sum, as the number of New Yorkers who are foreign-born or more comfortable in a language other than English has been increasing in the City, their numbers have been decreasing at the University, which appears to have become less accessible to them.  Because ethnolinguistic minorities are more likely to attend community colleges, because on average their household income is significantly below the average for students for whom English is a primary language and because they are more likely to be financially independent and supporting children, it is safe to predict that tuition increases at the community colleges would exacerbate these enrollment declines.

 

 

NOTE: As a service to the CUNY communitry, the PSC presents  testimony from the June 12 hearing of the City Council Committee on Higher Education and the June 16 hearing of the Board of Trustees.   The PSC opposes a tuition hike.  The full positions and arguments presented on these web pages are those of the individuals who testified and not necessarily those of the PSC unless identified as such.


 

back to main page of