| |

Above: A sea of purple "invisible
faculty"
signs as PSC members pack the
gallery at the Jan. 24 B.O.T.
monthly meeting. |
|
FEBRUARY 16,
2005 UPDATE
February 16, 2005
Contract
negotiations have continued during the final weeks of
January and early February. Some progress is beginning to
be made toward tentative agreement on certain PSC proposals,
but the two sides are still far apart. Management has not
budged from its 1.5% financial offer, and continues to
resist many of the PSC proposals for improving benefits and
working conditions. Below are summaries of the January
sessions; February to follow.
January 18,
2005
The
first topic at this session concerned the PSC demands on
moving toward equity in research time and annual leave time
for full-time faculty in the Counseling and Library
departments, who have research requirements similar to those
for other full-time faculty, but do not have equitable leave
time. The union has repeatedly expressed concern about
providing adequate numbers of qualified counselors to meet
the needs of our students. Management responded to the PSC
counterproposal and indicated a willingness to take some
steps toward improvements for these positions, as part of an
overall agreement. The union seeks further improvements.
The
PSC then moved to our demands on health and safety
protections. We offered to drop several demands and
concentrate on those that are most crucial: fire evacuation
procedures and air quality. Management replied that they
intended to comply with safety procedures, but they were
opposed to providing contractual protections in this area.
There was also discussion about Article 1 of the contract,
which stipulates who is included in the union’s collective
bargaining unit.
January 19,
2005
Management started with their response to the PSC proposals
on equity for adjuncts presented the previous week. They
indicated that they would be willing to make some
improvements in the areas the PSC views as basic
requirements for a decent workplace, but rejected PSC’s
larger equity proposals for adjuncts, including an enhanced
salary scale for adjuncts, fairness in sick days for
adjuncts, a seniority proposal or an expansion of the
adjunct office/professional hour negotiated in the last
contract. The PSC pointed out that the University has de
facto restructured its workforce and relies on 9,500
part-timers to teach the majority of CUNY courses; now
salaries and working conditions for part-timers must also be
restructured.
CUNY
management also responded to PSC counterproposals on
employees in the Higher Education Officer series, indicating
some movement on the proposals on job security. The PSC
repeated its opposition to weakened job security, and
offered some counterproposals on ways of addressing our
needs.
We
ended the session by pressing management for an increase in
their financial offer.
Barbara Bowen
PSC
President